public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Langote <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:30:41 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKJS1f-DGABDX3QHCGsi6UmDsxdmFkiKUYWQLs8pzeWLnOgnRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CAKJS1f_c8tngWJZjNcQY0KXHWVs4JZxyzoX_cGBEHbaWKUAC=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKJS1f8R8riwBXw==7ijV=UZNuhP+3qXgDBKSiM+=_cTf4mXXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKJS1f9TVMvGQdwxMemci34viPZuiLTFOJa4rc1Bfhm57WycFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKJS1f9FL6oKd52PLddKsbjkX26JHp5nMRxVA-W9Uf_1a9TwgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKJS1f-DGABDX3QHCGsi6UmDsxdmFkiKUYWQLs8pzeWLnOgnRw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:57:45PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 15:24, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:33:10PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 02:55, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > This brings up a few points.  First, it seems the change affects
> > > > partitioned tables and UNION ALL, which means it probably needs to be
> > > > listed in two sections.   Second, is it only parallelism paths that are
> > > > added?  I am not sure if people care about a node being removed,
> > > > especially when the might not even know we do that step, but they do
> > > > care if there are new optimization possibilities.
> > >
> > > Like Amit, I think the optimizer section is fine.  Another thing that
> > > is affected is that you may no longer get a Materialize node in the
> > > plan.  Previously you might have gotten something like Merge Join ->
> > > Materialize -> Append -> Seq Scan, now you might just get Merge Join
> > > -> Seq Scan.  This is because Append / MergeAppend don't support mark
> > > and restore. Removing them would allow the materialize node to be
> > > skipped in cases where the single subpath of the Append does support
> > > mark and restore.
> >
> > How is this patch for the item?  I put it in the Optimizer section.
> 
> That looks fine. Thank you.

Done, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +





view thread (63+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox