From: Stephen Amell <mrstephenamell@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
 David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>,
 "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>,
 pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
References: <20190516190806.GA14121@alvherre.pgsql>
Message-ID: <5e28ae21-34df-eb6b-b02f-e5e3bdaf3df5@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:18:42 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190516190806.GA14121@alvherre.pgsql>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: es-AR
Precedence: bulk


On 2019-05-16 16:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-May-16, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> I think the more specific we make the partition description, the more
>> limited it will appear to be.  I think almost all partition operations
>> will appear to be faster with PG 12, even if users can't articulate
>> exactly why.
> I don't understand why you want to make things such black boxes.  It is
> what it is, and some users (not all) will want to understand.  People
> who have already tested pg11 and found it insufficient may give pg12 a
> second look if we tell them we have fixed the deficiencies they found.

yep, I agree with Alvaro, I'm one of these users...