Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q51XO-0002Xk-6z for pgsql-advocacy@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:57:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q51XL-0004sx-9Y for pgsql-advocacy@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:57:35 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q51XL-0004sl-0B for pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:57:35 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1q51XH-003fFE-Mp for pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:57:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51458e3af68so2619431a12.2 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 02:57:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685699850; x=1688291850; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1yEPTLABxzyEzUZGsDfSs5mwajs46Y9YtSp4VnNx1/E=; b=c+iq1a3Ez+L76Vk6LTzrna4Yl5IeyJ3ivRKodANnlNiQuD0+3CSs7Flgg+h2p/lwhl RH3e5FisNf6V1bit4xbYTatgNPyX+HKL5sTk+FjONfPtrWr0yARj/nsR0N9rlU5A7Y7N 0eqGmbv04UGPFUxFhhi4GbOmlFWeK5U1RiUK6sHzanfXnl/fdE9lPweHJxUxiYExDnFX he3d0UGVHA+JUG+Tfnd0DNFKJw39oR46PZxDPbdhdT4ZTzwsUrPPwddiffHykUm9YwXb Bg7XNsyBC9SN7SyUOxipvSy5b/b3KxBnLVN2OSvDDGnqA/Ey/ZeHVlAffXRzRiXUqb/O 5OoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685699850; x=1688291850; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=1yEPTLABxzyEzUZGsDfSs5mwajs46Y9YtSp4VnNx1/E=; b=XNUjWp+lTnZj0RBezrzaUPOKwrpx7w9pnDBnHfXspvNiosNl10mji+eViptshuDrIy UWOyuK/SLdhc2k3sLrEAeFLpmlqWLx5V5jjdO1dKAZjdFkn3RCBFDER5l/bGeqzCHs56 VZ1nsyF0G4W7K3YqlZMNs1MZUYC6lEg1y7NmIrSIXJvCRN+S7HEDYSE1wWQJWcFAixkO c/5j9LbPe/EfGWthbRvieQyaZ52dqZtYVsKXZwhODagcnZnPYLLUuVjN9iRJXuJbEUA8 RtVpO5EQ/1raTJyiv0XOHMO6R60C3vCqHqUfweC454UCEqTtR8yk9P4dQFwo6vHllfz9 Jjnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwTyCkpd1TfnsGfF6OSXib8Ht3RAigNkVkFew/iPaIgWTws+3XU tvQvGBqdYFsYMYpOXkA7yhQTtcNzet+o6pNCUiXHnZ8wzbA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5NmSuLWV9izwu7hN7QIzIPAyZutfnAtifY8d+QHjW2ZhzQt+BgMG5+BA9IsXQHdNkfIOFrlHUYmQQ0KwEUTag= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d496:0:b0:516:416b:574d with SMTP id b22-20020aa7d496000000b00516416b574dmr355341edr.3.1685699850122; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 02:57:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Valeria Kaplan Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:57:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification To: Jaime Casanova Cc: Adrian Klaver , PostgreSQL Advocacy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c3bdf505fd2294a5" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000c3bdf505fd2294a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you for bringing this topic to discussion, Jaime! To add to Adrian's questions here are my 5 cents Postgres is a community that consists of people from different companies with variety of interests: - Postgres/open source/community-focused interests - personal interests - their company's interests To create a fully "unbiased" certification there is a need for a working group whose interests would be fully aligned. I must admit, I'm a bit pessimistic about a unified Postgres certification as it would put people who would be working on it in a difficult situation when they're serving all the abovementioned interests. Valeria On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 11:31=E2=80=AFPM Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 6/1/23 15:04, Jaime Casanova wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > At PgCon I mentioned a was going to create this thread so here we go: > > > > > > > So, having a certification made from a pool of validated > > questions/answers don't only will help companies choosing trainings > > but will in effect improve the quality of trainers. > > > > There are a lot of open questions yet, like where the exams will be > > taken. In the community infrastructure? in the company's? > > > > but I guess we have still enough for start commenting. > 1) Who oversees all of the above? > > 2) How are the questions and answers developed without leaking the > information out to test takers? > > 3) Does core mean just the community Postgres? > > > > > -- > > Jaime Casanova > > Director de Servicios Profesionales > > SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL > > > > > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.klaver@aklaver.com > > > > --000000000000c3bdf505fd2294a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you for bringing this topic to discussion, Jaim= e!

To add to Adrian's = questions here are my 5 cents

Postgres is a community th= at consists of people from different=C2=A0companies with variety of interes= ts:
- Postgres/open source/community-focused interests
= - personal interests
- their company's interests
To create a fully "unbiased" certification there is = a need for a working group whose interests=C2=A0would be fully aligned.=C2= =A0
I must admit, I'm a bit pessimistic about a unified Postg= res certification as it would put people who would be working on it in a di= fficult situation when they're serving all the abovementioned interests= .


Valeria


On Th= u, Jun 1, 2023 at 11:31=E2=80=AFPM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 6/1/23 15:04, Jaime Casa= nova wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> At PgCon I mentioned a was going to create this thread so here we go:<= br> >

>
> So, having a certification made from a pool of validated
> questions/answers don't only will help companies choosing training= s
> but will in effect improve the quality of trainers.
>
> There are a lot of open questions yet, like where the exams will be > taken. In the community infrastructure? in the company's?
>
> but I guess we have still enough for start commenting.
1) Who oversees all of the above?

2) How are the questions and answers developed without leaking the
information out to test takers?

3) Does core mean just the community Postgres?

>
> --
> Jaime Casanova
> Director de Servicios Profesionales
> SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klave= r@aklaver.com



--000000000000c3bdf505fd2294a5--