X-Original-To: pgsql-benchmarks-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A6DD1B262
	for <pgsql-benchmarks-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 15 Jun 2004 03:03:54 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 41616-05
	for <pgsql-benchmarks-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:03:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rediffmail.com (unknown [203.199.83.148])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B98C3D1B1BC
	for <pgsql-benchmarks@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 15 Jun 2004 03:03:42 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 28536 invoked by uid 510); 15 Jun 2004 06:03:40 -0000
Date: 15 Jun 2004 06:03:40 -0000
Message-ID: <20040615060340.28535.qmail@webmail26.rediffmail.com>
Received: from unknown (203.199.33.2) by rediffmail.com via HTTP;
	15 jun 2004 06:03:40 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Neeraj " <bunku@rediffmail.com>
Reply-To: "Neeraj " <bunku@rediffmail.com>
To: pgsql-benchmarks@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Interpreting OSDB Results
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="Next_1087279420---0-203.199.83.148-28517"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10, HTML_MESSAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200406/2
X-Sequence-Number: 13

 This is a multipart mime message


--Next_1087279420---0-203.199.83.148-28517
Content-type: text/html;
	charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<P>
Hi All,<BR>
<BR>
Im testing my postgres 7.3.2 db on redhat 9.0 using osdb 0.16. I couldnot f=
ind any docuementation&nbsp; for interpreting the results obtained. Im doin=
g multiuser (10 users) test. I've two different con figurations for postgre=
sql.conf. In one it takes 44 mins to finish while in other it takes 18 mins=
 to finish. But tps (both mixed IR &amp; mixed OLTP) is very high in first =
one. Also i want to know relation between tuples/sec and transactions/sec. =
<BR>
<BR>
Thanks &amp; Regards<BR>
<BR>

</P>


Neeraj Malhotra<br><br>
<A target=3D"_blank" HREF=3D"http://clients.rediff.com/signature/track_sig.=
asp"><IMG SRC=3D"http://ads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_nx.cgi/www.re=
diffmail.com/inbox.htm@Bottom" BORDER=3D0 VSPACE=3D0 HSPACE=3D0></a>

--Next_1087279420---0-203.199.83.148-28517
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi All,

Im testing my postgres 7.3.2 db on redhat 9.0 using osdb 0.16. I couldnot f=
ind any docuementation  for interpreting the results obtained. Im doing mul=
tiuser (10 users) test. I've two different con figurations for postgresql.c=
onf. In one it takes 44 mins to finish while in other it takes 18 mins to f=
inish. But tps (both mixed IR & mixed OLTP) is very high in first one. Also=
 i want to know relation between tuples/sec and transactions/sec.=20

Thanks & Regards



Neeraj Malhotra
--Next_1087279420---0-203.199.83.148-28517--