Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwYN4-0001ro-SA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:44:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwYN4-0006Rl-DP for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:44:46 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwYN2-0006P8-Km; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:44:44 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwYMv-0006ZJ-R3; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:44:43 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v8PIiYnx001091; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:44:34 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: "David E. Wheeler" , Christophe Pettus , pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? In-reply-to: <7ca5214d-f981-54e4-c65a-470a87aa665e@2ndQuadrant.com> References: <20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <15165.1506116768@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3cece400-af56-7145-2e65-f044de1b0b68@2ndQuadrant.com> <28968.1506136792@sss.pgh.pa.us> <24380.1506179805@sss.pgh.pa.us> <16272.1506189656@sss.pgh.pa.us> <928f5974-151f-0273-0221-fac213e7624f@2ndQuadrant.com> <19137.1506196325@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4942e2c0-3302-f496-d4c1-a967f77d0143@2ndQuadrant.com> <25662.1506204381@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9479302a-09b8-4264-f9c4-514b65f18547@2ndQuadrant.com> <18127.1506285450@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2770f70a-5977-3fa1-1065-11b4cc69f07f@2ndQuadrant.com> <23438.1506294409@sss.pgh.pa.us> <25809.1506348877@sss.pgh.pa.us> <27064.1506350579@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5f4f29bf-90b1-e49a-6cf9-069c59bc1067@2ndQuadrant.com> <40FDB1F3-932D-4912-B4C7-F1E26E331079@justatheory.com> <7ca5214d-f981-54e4-c65a-470a87aa665e@2ndQuad! rant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:17:09 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1089.1506365074.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:44:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1090.1506365074@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andrew Dunstan writes: > OK, that seems to be the consensus. So let's apply the blacklist patch > and then separately remove the 'created in the same transaction' test. > We'll need to adjust the regression tests and docs accordingly. Agreed. I'll work on that in a little bit. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers