Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u7J4b-00EINY-Pn for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:14:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u7J4a-00HFYb-1s for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:14:24 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u7J4Z-00HFYQ-PZ for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:14:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u7J4Y-001P53-1E for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:14:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 53MJEJAo1118298; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:14:19 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Kirill Reshke , pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Command order bug in pg_dump In-reply-to: <202504221908.4py5zqgmm422@alvherre.pgsql> References: <202504221908.4py5zqgmm422@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Tue, 22 Apr 2025 21:08:07 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1118296.1745349259.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:14:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1118297.1745349259@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > On 2025-Apr-21, Tom Lane wrote: >> I experimented with the attached, which approximates "add some digits >> to the name used for the parent constraint". (We could refactor >> ChooseConstraintName if we wanted a less approximate version of that >> rule, but I'm not sure it's worth the trouble.) > This seems a better implementation of the idea than what I had in mind. > For my part, please feel free to go ahead with this. OK. I'll take a look first at whether the aforesaid refactoring is easy enough to be worth doing. > FWIW I've been migrating my main email address to a new domain. Finally > got sick of noip.com. Got it, thanks for the heads-up. regards, tom lane