Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1u2LIm-00GdZM-FY
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2025 02:36:32 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1u2LIk-00HRv6-7e
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2025 02:36:30 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1u2LIj-00HRuy-Vq
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2025 02:36:30 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1u2LIi-004FXE-0L
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org;
	Wed, 09 Apr 2025 02:36:29 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5392aQTA112034;
	Tue, 8 Apr 2025 22:36:26 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
cc: Kaimeh <kkaimeh@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Error when using array_agg with filter where clause in pg16 and
 pg17
In-reply-to: 
 <CAApHDvqi79jXFBeaOSDok8psEkTpzgHzaKje6VCyKVtj=Ss1_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAK-+Jz9J=Q06-M7cDJoPNeYbz5EZDqkjQbJnmRyQyzkbRGsYkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4040920.1744126348@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvqb8BxPvh3wwVc1YXNWGVVw9nJ49mFsdOwzHjBji0qDPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <90177.1744158354@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvrf8q52wZN08zygw5H2RE5z74u9toXckZnK_rt5KXNVyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <101611.1744159946@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvqi79jXFBeaOSDok8psEkTpzgHzaKje6VCyKVtj=Ss1_A@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 09 Apr 2025 13:50:48 +1200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <112032.1744166186.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 22:36:26 -0400
Message-ID: <112033.1744166186@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/112033.1744166186%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm not following why my in method if the planner chooses a poor plan
> is any different from the planner choosing a poor plan for anything
> else because the stats or costs aren't a good reflection of reality.

Well, we hope we'll usually pick the right thing.  But upthread
you were complaining that any change might be a regression, or
at least that's how I read it.

			regards, tom lane