From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>, adoros@starfishstorage.com,
        pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, rmt@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #19480: PL/Python SRF crashes (SIGSEGV) when function is
 replaced mid-iteration: use-after-free in PLy_funct
In-reply-to: <c07f8261-4c65-47da-bb97-5a2246816b57@iki.fi>
References: <19480-f1f9fdce30462fc4@postgresql.org>
 <DIS405H05GE0.1OPMN9BEKKMS1@gmail.com> <982975.1779981146@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <DIY2500FL0UW.Z4M7NYWMGGA4@gmail.com> <2868592.1780356411@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <DJ1BFHKUC06G.1NO3D0WC9KBV6@gmail.com> <3770958.1780686685@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <9ecd2bd5-0fec-4ec2-9800-eb071683128c@gmail.com>
 <c07f8261-4c65-47da-bb97-5a2246816b57@iki.fi>
Comments: In-reply-to Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
	message dated "Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:30:30 +0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1125802.1781711796.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 11:56:36 -0400
Message-ID: <1125803.1781711796@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1125803.1781711796%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>>>> Looping in the RMT to see what they think...

> It's fine to still sneak it into v19. It's better to have it earlier, 
> even if it means more churn during beta period.

OK.  I haven't looked closely at the patch yet, but will proceed with
reviewing it.

> I haven't looked closely at the patch, but since it's a bug fix it would 
> make sense to backpatch. If we're uncomfortable with backpatching it 
> now, we could commit in master now, and backpatch later when we have 
> more confidence.

I'm of the opinion that the risk-reward ratio is not great for putting
this into stable branches.  The case that fails is just not something
I'd expect people to do a lot in production.  So I'm content with
sneaking it into v19.

			regards, tom lane