From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C3=3Flvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>,
        exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18984: Empty prepared statement from psql \parse triggers
 assert in PortalRunMulti
In-reply-to: <aHbk8A4bSBIYtHIl@paquier.xyz>
References: <18984-0f4778a6599ac3ae@postgresql.org>
 <715434.1752521761@sss.pgh.pa.us> <799185.1752535067@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <923531.1752595534@sss.pgh.pa.us> <aHbk8A4bSBIYtHIl@paquier.xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
	message dated "Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:32:00 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1143239.1752622819.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:40:19 -0400
Message-ID: <1143240.1752622819@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1143240.1752622819%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:05:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps we should
>> add something about the possibility that an outer Portal level
>> can supply a default command tag if we lack one now?

> You mean as an extra assertion?  I am not sure that this is strongly
> necessary but why not.

No, I meant that the comment could explain that if we fail to assign a
non-unknown CMDTAG here, there's still a possibility of an outer
Portal level supplying one.  But I don't see how to make a useful
assertion about that.

			regards, tom lane