Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r1AIr-009iK6-Uh for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 19:02:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r1AIq-00GKfn-CC for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 19:02:56 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r1AIq-00GKfe-27 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 19:02:56 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r1AIn-004mlX-Hv for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 19:02:54 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3A9J2pFn1154733; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:02:51 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Jacob Champion cc: Stephen Frost , Andrew Dunstan , Akshat Jaimini , PostgreSQL Hackers , Aleksander Alekseev Subject: Re: pg_dump needs SELECT privileges on irrelevant extension table In-reply-to: <409488.1698086543@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <00d46a48-3324-d9a0-49bf-e7f0f11d1038@timescale.com> <954419.1679334206@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2905669.1697573572@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2984517.1697577076@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3152156.1697660739@sss.pgh.pa.us> <409488.1698086543@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:42:23 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1154731.1699556571.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 14:02:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1154732.1699556571@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > Jacob Champion writes: >> Is this approach backportable? > The code fix would surely work in the back branches. Whether the > behavioral change is too big to be acceptable in minor releases > is something I don't have a strong opinion on. I'm hearing nothing but crickets :-( If nobody objects by say Monday, I'm going to go ahead and commit (and backpatch) the patch I posted at [1]. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2984517.1697577076%40sss.pgh.pa.us