Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdBN4-002TDu-N5 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:20:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdBN3-00CQdP-Bt for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:20:09 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdBN3-00CQd6-2P for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:20:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdBMz-002hbh-VM for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:20:07 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 384FK4ug1160596; Mon, 4 Sep 2023 11:20:04 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: dukeastar@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18082: coredump during initdb In-reply-to: <18082-726da60b1e2e25d2@postgresql.org> References: <18082-726da60b1e2e25d2@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Mon, 04 Sep 2023 14:36:54 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1160594.1693840804.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 11:20:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1160595.1693840804@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > Operating system: CentOS release 5.8 (Final) - Linux dev-linuxx86 > 2.6.18-308.el5 #1 SMP Tue Feb 21 20:05:41 EST 2012 i686 i686 So I suppose your compiler is also a dozen years old? I don't see any good reason to think this isn't a compiler bug. If you can't upgrade to a newer compiler version, backing off the default optimization level is probably your best option. But we don't test or support operating systems that old. regards, tom lane