Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from
 <pgsql-bugs-owner+M48461=pgsql+2Dbugs=arkaria.postgresql.org@postgresql.org>)
	id 1dgCLN-0003Ul-79
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:59:25 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from
 <pgsql-bugs-owner+M48461=pgsql+2Dbugs=arkaria.postgresql.org@postgresql.org>)
	id 1dgCLM-0001gk-LU
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:59:24 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1dgCLM-0001gQ-6E
	for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:59:24 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1dgCLI-0001kU-HA
	for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:59:23 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v7BFxEGa011674;
	Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:59:14 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Adam,
    Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne.adam@nokia.com>
cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org,
        "Duquesne,
    Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre.duquesne@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
In-reply-to: 
 <CAL7LBcYM-32B=n_-h_wPHWiML26UvqP3b_WxD7MgXgOwmxvTFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAL7LBcYM-32B=n_-h_wPHWiML26UvqP3b_WxD7MgXgOwmxvTFw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Adam,
 Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne.adam@nokia.com>
	message dated "Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:33:22 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <11672.1502467154.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:59:14 -0400
Message-ID: <11673.1502467154@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-ID: <pgsql-bugs.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org

"Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne.adam@nokia.com> w=
rites:
> ERROR:  XX000: unrecognized node type: 90
> LOCATION:  ExecReScan, execAmi.c:284

(gdb) p (NodeTag) 90
$1 =3D T_GatherMergeState

So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
to plug it into ExecReScan.  From which we may draw depressing conclusions
about how much it's been tested.

Thanks for the report!

			regards, tom lane


--=20
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs