From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
cc: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>, 1026592243@qq.com,
        pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts",
 fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943
In-reply-to: <202406241517.ugtdq7tokfnx@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <202406241517.ugtdq7tokfnx@alvherre.pgsql>
Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
	message dated "Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:17:04 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1168678.1719245189.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:06:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1168679.1719245189@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1168679.1719245189%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Sigh.  No, I missed that.  I'm going to revert it now, because I see that
> skink failed.  I don't see how my patch is to blame since it's a timeout
> and we have no logs for the failure; but maybe my patch did make
> something slower and caused some test to go over the time limit.

skink's been doing that intermittently for some time; I wouldn't
assume this patch is especially to blame.

Given the lack of other failures, maybe you should leave it as-is.
It's not really per policy, but after all this is just a beta ...

			regards, tom lane