Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFN9p-00CgHl-DO for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:40:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFN9m-00AKih-2c for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:40:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFN9l-00AKiY-Pu for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:40:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFN9i-003bvB-AN for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:40:48 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4AP0eTWE1224235; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:40:29 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Heikki Linnakangas , =?UTF-8?Q?Bastien_Roucari=C3=A8s?= , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal In-reply-to: <1216860.1732491268@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <4496616.iHFcN1HehY@portable-bastien> <1156374.1730396928@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7ec1c65c-1a28-49a7-af43-f77c260a3df6@iki.fi> <1292593.1730399134@sss.pgh.pa.us> <707008.1732325995@sss.pgh.pa.us> <736756.1732341046@sss.pgh.pa.us> <865773.1732399354@sss.pgh.pa.us> <885805.1732406935@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1074317.1732479406@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1216860.1732491268@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:34:28 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1224233.1732495229.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:40:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1224234.1732495229@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > It's very confusing, especially given this: > $ gcc -march=3Darmv8-a+crc+fp testarm32.c > gcc: error: 'armv8-a' does not support feature 'fp' > gcc: note: valid feature names are: crc simd crypto nocrypto nofp sb pre= dres; did you mean 'nofp'? > If they think that base armv8-a doesn't include FP, why is there a > +nofp option? Bug filed at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D117766 We'll see what they say, but it seems like we need a workaround in any case. regards, tom lane