Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nyeYG-0003HK-S9 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 19:07:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nyeYF-0005YX-KK for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 19:07:39 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nyeYF-0005YN-Bo for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 19:07:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nyeYC-0004sg-Oy for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 19:07:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 257J7YQe1264309; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:07:34 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxlxaEgWmVsZW7DvQ==?= cc: David Rowley , PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #17512: Process running query fails with SIGSEV - nodeMemoize.c:349 In-reply-to: References: <17512-36fa5fab90f48af9@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?B?QWxlxaEgWmVsZW7DvQ==?= message dated "Tue, 07 Jun 2022 19:04:38 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1264307.1654628854.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:07:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1264308.1654628854@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > So far, it looks that the query I've been using to prove the SIGSEV works > fine when I disabled jit by setting > jit=off Oh! So it's (probably) not a Memoize problem, it's an LLVM problem. > The jit package is postgresql14-llvmjit-14.2-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64 Hm. What LLVM version have you got on that machine? (And I wonder whether it's the same as what Devrim built this PGDG package against.) regards, tom lane