Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZwWj-0001vX-S7 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:11:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZwWi-0003B9-JY for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:11:24 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZwWi-0003B1-Cd for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:11:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZwWg-0007fb-CR for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:11:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13NEBKZG1314070; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:11:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: tharakan@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16979: WITH RECURSIVE SQL crashes v13.x In-reply-to: <16979-45e2d5fc7ace1ad9@postgresql.org> References: <16979-45e2d5fc7ace1ad9@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:54:58 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1314068.1619187080.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:11:20 -0400 Message-ID: <1314069.1619187080@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > This SQL is a stripped down version (from a SQLSmith crash) and am posting > here since this appears to be a regression in v13. Can't reproduce this, either. It works fine for me even at the minimum allowed setting max_stack_depth = '100kB'. Maybe you have some local changes in the vicinity of the problem? regards, tom lane