Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uebcp-00CK1b-Ri for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:43:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uebco-002xMR-Nb for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:43:23 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uebco-002xMJ-FP for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:43:22 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uebcn-000PKX-05 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 15:43:21 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 56NFhJlG1322220; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:43:19 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Watkins cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18995: Building with GCC 14 fails: incompatible pointer struct pam_message In-reply-to: References: <18995-82058da9ab4337a7@postgresql.org> <1313566.1753280855@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Watkins message dated "Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:31:10 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1322218.1753285399.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:43:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1322219.1753285399@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andrew Watkins writes: > Sorry, for digging up an old problem . I did some searching of the archive > but never found that link going back to 2007. No trouble. I'm surprised we never did anything about it, TBH. Reviewing our buildfarm members, it looks like none of the current Solaris or illumos/OpenIndiana animals use --with-pam, which is a bit sad but explains why we don't see any warnings in the farm. And I guess end users have just ignored the warning so far. But we'll have to up our game if GCC is going to start making this an error by default. regards, tom lane