Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXGBz-0005Rg-5i for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 06:43:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXGBx-0006c8-Vn for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 06:43:57 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXGBx-0006bz-Ng for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 06:43:57 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXGBs-0002wJ-0F for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 06:43:57 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3216hot01327896; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 01:43:50 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Sudheer H R cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Memory leakage in libpq valgrind test In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Sudheer H R message dated "Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:04:40 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1327894.1677653030.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 01:43:50 -0500 Message-ID: <1327895.1677653030@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Sudheer H R writes: > While running valgrind to detect memory leaks, found the following as on= e of the leaks. > Request you to comment on this. So ... why do you think this is our bug, and not a Kerberos bug? The leak seems to be buried quite far in libgssapi_krb5.so. regards, tom lane