Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxcS5-0001AU-O2 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 19:27:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxcS4-0003dk-DW for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 19:27:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxcS4-0003UX-2v for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 19:27:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxcS1-0002Sj-BW for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 19:27:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7DJRHeJ013352; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:27:17 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: cybersly7@hotmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15955: changes in pg_dump from 11.4 to 11.5 In-reply-to: <15955-1daa2e676e903d87@postgresql.org> References: <15955-1daa2e676e903d87@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Tue, 13 Aug 2019 19:07:07 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <13350.1565724437.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:27:17 -0400 Message-ID: <13351.1565724437@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > currently in the process of migrating a 8.1.23 to 11.x ( I know its > unsupported, long story) > these changes > (https://fossies.org/diffs/postgresql/11.4_vs_11.5/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_du= mp.c-diff.html) > now make it impossible to dump the old database from the new server. Hmm, yeah, somebody (probably me) was sloppy there. Will look into it, thanks for the report! regards, tom lane