Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1v9Cq8-00CQdf-3B
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 01:31:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1v9Cq6-009GnP-V0
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 01:31:33 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1v9Cq6-009Gmk-Mw
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 01:31:33 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1v9Cq4-00203J-0R
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2025 01:31:32 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 59G1VTIq1347708;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2025 21:31:29 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, andrewbille@gmail.com,
        pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #19086: pg_dump --data-only selects and do not uses index
 definitions for the dumped tables.
In-reply-to: 
 <CAApHDvoMvU2=bDKLDZq1y4FM7k5FsOgogsiqJ3gaJ+G8yLTq-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <19086-871ff11017d03dc5@postgresql.org> <aO6mUj9H2WpEFylG@nathan>
 <1000041.1760471415@sss.pgh.pa.us> <aO7IoIEnQDbtFzrs@nathan>
 <CAApHDvoU2O-_zKNL-toHwkDcMXCzzvgRUTnA3baEEhCB4vqMRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <aO_KwnHm2AVn0E4m@nathan>
 <CAApHDvrcM4G0==52jFoAvmxk6ZRjXKq7nkik=fqq6BH=dSJsYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1324003.1760565328@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvrffhKALh3jQM6Kmar5nt=2xgHC_0ErhTFvM32b_JT-Cw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1334977.1760571380@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvp-BsfUne0TckE5f8-E9Ou3+2+fT0aN2OB+ccC88zy-yQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1342348.1760575547@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvoMvU2=bDKLDZq1y4FM7k5FsOgogsiqJ3gaJ+G8yLTq-A@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 16 Oct 2025 14:23:10 +1300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1347706.1760578289.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 21:31:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1347707.1760578289@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1347707.1760578289%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> Just to put that to the test, I tried the attached.

I'm confused by all the extraneous changes in this?

> i.e about 3.5x faster with ignore_system_indexes and 38% faster without.

Very promising, but I'm still confused.

			regards, tom lane