Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDHav-0003fr-HT for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:16:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDHav-0005tJ-29 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:16:13 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDHau-0005sR-2W for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:16:12 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eDHar-0006yf-MG for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:16:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id vAAMG7ic014076; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:16:07 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Vincent Lachenal cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request In-reply-to: References: <20171110185747.31519.28038@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <1415.1510340891@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5652.1510344738@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7710.1510346813@sss.pgh.pa.us> <10197.1510349123@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Vincent Lachenal message dated "Fri, 10 Nov 2017 21:45:17 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14074.1510352167.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:16:07 -0500 Message-ID: <14075.1510352167@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org Vincent Lachenal writes: > With a fresh database, bug is still here ... > I will try to compile PostgreSQL on my computer before open a bug on > Archlinux (I will also try the testing Gentoo package). If I find something > interesting, I will reply in in this thread. > Thanks for your help and your reactivity. The bug seems to be limited to my > specific environment which is a good news (Arch has been installed for > almost 4 years and is not known for its stablility). FWIW, I tried a build on Fedora 25 using the same compiler flags you showed. Works OK there too. So this suggests possibly an Archlinux- specific compiler bug, though I wouldn't want to pin blame without more evidence. It'd definitely be interesting to see a stack trace, if you manage to reproduce the problem in a debug-enabled build. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs