Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efVfP-0002yc-HE for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:57:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1efVfO-0007d1-Nr for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:57:30 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1efVfO-0007cs-F1 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:57:30 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efVfM-00019t-7q for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:57:29 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0RIvQbG014657; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:57:26 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Guo Xiang Tan cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Robert Haas Subject: Re: BUG #15032: Segmentation fault when running a particular query In-reply-to: <19519.1517017367@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <20180126074932.3098.97815@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <13015.1516992308@sss.pgh.pa.us> <19519.1517017367@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:42:47 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14655.1517079446.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:57:26 -0500 Message-ID: <14656.1517079446@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > I'll look into an actual fix tomorrow. I've pushed a fix for this. I concluded that there's no real reason to touch branches before 10: the index_markpos call is useless in the case in question, but it doesn't do any more than waste some cycles. regards, tom lane