Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gQLFX-0000ov-LJ for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:52:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gQLFV-0006gd-R8 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:52:37 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gQLFV-0006gT-CJ for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:52:37 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gQLFS-0004hf-Fr for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:52:35 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wANNqWfc015116; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:52:32 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Gierth cc: victor@magic.io, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15519: Casting float4 into int4 gets the wrong sign instead of "integer out of range" error In-reply-to: <87zhtzqs9o.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> References: <15519-4fc785b483201ff1@postgresql.org> <874lc7sb1a.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> <13162.1543014227@sss.pgh.pa.us> <87zhtzqs9o.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Gierth message dated "Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:42:50 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <15114.1543017152.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:52:32 -0500 Message-ID: <15115.1543017152@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Andrew Gierth writes: > "Tom" =3D=3D Tom Lane writes: > Tom> if (unlikely(num < (float4) INT_MIN || num >=3D (float4) INT_= MAX || isnan(num))) > if (num < (float4)INT_MIN || num >=3D -(float4)INT_MIN || ... Meh. Seems to me that's relying on pretty much the same assumptions and throwing in an extra dollop of obscurantism on top. regards, tom lane