Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxSv-0005MU-6D for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:32:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxSu-0002qz-M2 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:32:28 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxSt-0002qB-Gw; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:32:27 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxSq-00077g-9m; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:32:26 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v8QLWFfO016026; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:32:15 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: Andrew Dunstan , "David E. Wheeler" , Christophe Pettus , pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? In-reply-to: <20170926211419.GB7167@momjian.us> References: <25809.1506348877@sss.pgh.pa.us> <27064.1506350579@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5f4f29bf-90b1-e49a-6cf9-069c59bc1067@2ndQuadrant.com> <40FDB1F3-932D-4912-B4C7-F1E26E331079@justatheory.com> <1090.1506365074@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9666.1506446327@sss.pgh.pa.us> <329.1506451066@sss.pgh.pa.us> <38835cdd-!c378-8d7a-013b-fd733c78c649@2ndQuadrant.com> <12792.1506456422@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20170926211419.GB7167@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:14:19 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <16024.1506461535.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:32:15 -0400 Message-ID: <16025.1506461535@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org Bruce Momjian writes: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:07:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Any other votes out there? > Well, I was concerned yesterday that we had a broken build farm so close > to release. (I got consistent regression failures.) I think PG 11 would > be better for this feature change, so I support reverting this. I'll take the blame for (most of) yesterday's failures in the v10 branch, but they were unrelated to this patch --- they were because of that SIGBUS patch I messed up. So that doesn't seem like a very applicable argument. Still, it's true that this seems like the most consequential patch that's gone into v10 post-RC1, certainly so if you discount stuff that was back-patched further than v10. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs