Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjOwp-0001Cl-6w for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 14:12:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjOwn-000479-1U for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 14:12:21 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjOwm-000472-QG for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 14:12:20 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjOwk-0000nj-Q1 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 14:12:20 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x65ECDHM001605; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 10:12:13 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: raphael.geng@bizerba.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15897: make failed postgres 11.4 at 32 bit build In-reply-to: <15897-5f3bb7c16f2347e6@postgresql.org> References: <15897-5f3bb7c16f2347e6@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:10:32 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1603.1562335933.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 10:12:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1604.1562335933@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > i tryied to build postgres 11.4 on 32 bit sles 12.1. > make -j10 DESTDIR=/postgres/src/workdir/result install Not sure that anyone really tests going directly to "install" with such a high -j factor. You might've found a parallelism weakness in the makefiles. I tend to do "make -j8 all" and then "make install" and have never seen a problem with that. regards, tom lane