Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAYmN-00044E-Qb for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:18:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAYmM-0001GU-Pg for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:18:54 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAYmM-0001GL-J6 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:18:54 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAYmI-0008Nd-EJ for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:18:54 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 172EIkMt1625896; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 10:18:47 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: Rui An , "pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Many queries stuck for waiting MultiXactOffsetControlLock on PostgreSQL 9.6.1 replica In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" message dated "Sun, 01 Aug 2021 22:48:40 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <1625894.1627913926.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 10:18:46 -0400 Message-ID: <1625895.1627913926@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "David G. Johnston" writes: > And you should also be prepared for the possibility that 9.6 is > discontinued before there is a fix in which case you=E2=80=99d have to u= pgrade to > v10 (at least) to get said fix. If the fix is as complex as what's being discussed over at [1], there is zero chance that it'd be back-patched at all. Nonetheless, still being on 9.6.1 at this late date is next door to software malpractice. There are a *lot* of known bugs in that version that have been fixed, including performance issues [2]. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2BEC2B3F-9B61-4C1D-9FB5-5FA= B0F05EF86%40yandex-team.ru [2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/