From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Lowell Hought <lowell.hought@gmail.com>
cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18950: pgsql function that worked in Postgresql 16 does not
 return in Postgresql 17
In-reply-to: 
 <CAJtAGPrmPgyLZfL2TL5oN8iN2yzz0=r98twiHWrWxos0ytmGtA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e9eb5136fb60188fc61c110e9706709fc13638e0.camel@cybertec.at>
 <75D714EA-CD1E-4F80-A2E8-29E378EC2200@gmail.com>
 <81946.1749348479@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAJtAGPpa4yYS6LLO5RHzwe9q7NpHiuuvEX1wVtErpie3EBWZJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJtAGPrcK_gp8FuEzp4tTbLKD1mqFGY5yDk0FX_1AGDjVJXAuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJtAGPpeqrgKNHdWqr=uPu1_UwN_TAgUvN4cfcWOaRN8U+8zDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <89144.1749352271@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAJtAGPpURGxCJRWVeFsPbu2fjtaSCwVsBNZ5_QW0wE5N6Z-N=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <90964.1749353175@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAJtAGPof_SZ4mWHwv5QJqu43NzmO7EVCW_Rc-EDX8qKemCsyhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJtAGPrmPgyLZfL2TL5oN8iN2yzz0=r98twiHWrWxos0ytmGtA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Lowell Hought <lowell.hought@gmail.com>
	message dated "Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:27:19 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1628599.1749914148.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:15:48 -0400
Message-ID: <1628600.1749914148@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1628600.1749914148%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Lowell Hought <lowell.hought@gmail.com> writes:
> Why would it return with a LIMIT clause, but not without the LIMIT clause?

[ shrug... ]  I still suppose this is due to a poor choice of plan
in the no-LIMIT case, but you've yet to provide the info needed
for someone else to reproduce the problem.  You could try comparing
EXPLAIN output in the LIMIT and no-LIMIT cases.

			regards, tom lane