Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1lvKrJ-0000OY-3E
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:25:05 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1lvKrG-0007Ul-7B
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:25:02 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1lvKrG-0007Tp-0i
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:25:02 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1lvKrE-0001bE-4l
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:25:01 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15LEOw8M1644010;
	Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:24:58 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
cc: cyg0810@gmail.com,
        PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17067: FailedAssertion at castNodeImpl
In-reply-to: 
 <CAApHDvpCOxxskM16wunXBz_w2BXptjoaRy9_CNLvYtvij__XXw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17067-665d50fa321f79e0@postgresql.org>
 <CAApHDvppyj_WrraCrSgQvDd_NGJp87S6ht6OzjytomMNqa_rxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1641484.1624282409@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvpCOxxskM16wunXBz_w2BXptjoaRy9_CNLvYtvij__XXw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
	message dated "Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:18:33 +1200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1644008.1624285498.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:24:58 -0400
Message-ID: <1644009.1624285498@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1644009.1624285498%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 01:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm guessing the real problem is that something upstream is
>> generating the wrong type of list in this example.

> My analysis into why that test passes is in [1]. Did you miss that or
> did you have another idea?

Yeah, I hadn't gotten to that yet :-(.  Never mind ...

			regards, tom lane