Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLMnr-0003hz-5r for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:54:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLMnq-0007CZ-Fh for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:54:42 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLMn9-0005zF-P5 for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:53:59 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLMn7-00069v-Ka for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:53:58 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v5F4rsVP001725; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:53:54 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: khuddleston@pivotal.io, PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types In-reply-to: References: <20170614232259.1424.82774@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <22824.1497487336@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:52:01 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1723.1497502434.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:53:54 -0400 Message-ID: <1724.1497502434@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org Michael Paquier writes: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> ... but yeah, as long as we're supporting it at all, that shouldn't >> happen. Thanks for the report! > Tom, are you working on a patch? At quick glance, this is just missing a > call to recordDependencyOn() in SetFunctionReturnType(). No, I'm going to bed soon. If you want to fix this, have at it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs