pg.ddx.io pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedBUG #18378: postgis protobuf support inconsistent
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* BUG #18378: postgis protobuf support inconsistent
@ 2024-03-05 06:58 PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: PG Bug reporting form @ 2024-03-05 06:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; +Cc: chriswvandevelde@gmail.com
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 18378
Logged by: Chris Van de Velde
Email address: chriswvandevelde@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 13.14
Operating system: Centos7/Rocky8
Description:
We build various postgresql distros that include postgis as sourced from
https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/13/redhat and have noticed
inconsistent configuration for protobuf support in postgis across
architectures and even within architectures/OS versions. Is it possible to
at least get the most recent releases for Redhat 7 (3.3 for amd64 & 3.2 for
arm) rebuilt with protobuf support enabled (see
https://postgis.net/docs/postgis_installation.html#installation_configuration
for requirements). Alternatively, could the current release (3.4) for RH7
amd64 + arm be built with protobuffer support enabled?
postgisVersion.Rh7.amd64=33 -> does not include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh7.amd64=32 -> does not include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh7.amd64=31 -> does not include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh7.amd64=30 -> *does* include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh8.amd64=34 -> *does* include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh8.amd64=33 -> *does* include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh8.amd64=31 -> *does* include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh8.arm64=34 -> *does* include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh7.arm64=32 -> does not include protobuf
postgisVersion.Rh7.arm64=31 -> does not include protobuf
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG #18378: postgis protobuf support inconsistent
@ 2024-03-05 08:09 Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
parent: PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Devrim Gündüz @ 2024-03-05 08:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chriswvandevelde@gmail.com; pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Hi,
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 06:58 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> Is it possible to at least get the most recent releases for Redhat 7
> (3.3 for amd64 & 3.2 for arm) rebuilt with protobuf support enabled
> (see
> https://postgis.net/docs/postgis_installation.html#installation_configuration
> for requirements). Alternatively, could the current release (3.4) for
> RH7 amd64 + arm be built with protobuffer support enabled?
No. Two reasons:
- PostGIS >= 3.1 requires Protobuf >= 1.1.0 and RHEL only has 1.0.2
- PostGIS 3.0 requires protobuf 1.0.0 and RHEL 7 supports only that
- Most of the GIS dependencies cannot be built on RHEL 7
- RHEL 7 is almost EOL
Well, four reasons apparently.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-05 08:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-05 06:58 BUG #18378: postgis protobuf support inconsistent PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
2024-03-05 08:09 ` Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox