Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1qIVGL-0001Cq-O5
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 14:19:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1qIVFL-00032K-Si
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 14:18:43 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1qIVFL-00032B-Jd
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 14:18:43 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1qIVFA-0036gZ-Kw
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 14:18:43 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 369EIUDJ1867444;
	Sun, 9 Jul 2023 10:18:30 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>, richard.vesely@softea.sk,
        pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18016: REINDEX TABLE failure
In-reply-to: <ZKpn+44jciv6Ym3/@paquier.xyz>
References: <18016-2bd9b549b1fe49b3@postgresql.org>
 <ZKirERBzkM48E0op@paquier.xyz> <1457241.1688775601@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CABwTF4XCTA=guV=4v3xkQnKhtqKsW2njeKeZCNtDhSFoYRWfDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZKpn+44jciv6Ym3/@paquier.xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
	message dated "Sun, 09 Jul 2023 16:55:39 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1867442.1688912310.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2023 10:18:30 -0400
Message-ID: <1867443.1688912310@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1867443.1688912310%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> That should be OK, I assume.  However, if this is improved and
> something we want to support in the long-run I guess that a TAP test
> may be appropriate.

I do not see the point of a TAP test.  It's not like the code isn't
covered perfectly well.

			regards, tom lane