Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsMjR-001CnJ-6Z for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:06:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsMjP-005sqt-Cg for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:06:47 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsMjP-005sqD-4C for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:06:47 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsMjM-002Qxb-1L for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:06:45 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 52CE6f1V1954195; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:06:41 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: mat999@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18839: ARMv7 builds fail due to missing __crc32cw and similar In-reply-to: <18839-7615d0f8267dc015@postgresql.org> References: <18839-7615d0f8267dc015@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Wed, 12 Mar 2025 05:40:28 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1954193.1741788401.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:06:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1954194.1741788401@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > Changes made to support hardware CRC seem to have broken ARMv7 builds for > us. What is your build platform *exactly* -- what OS version, C compiler version, etc? "Debian" is not an adequate description. Did you use any nondefault configure options? Which PG version did you last build successfully? regards, tom lane