Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tkeBa-005eve-GF for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:07:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tkeAa-004uf2-MZ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:06:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tkeAa-004uet-DA for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:06:56 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tkeAY-001iPU-1F for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:06:56 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 51J76pG81956237; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 02:06:51 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Sergey Belyashov cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Tomas Vondra Subject: Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault In-reply-to: References: <18815-2a0407cc7f40b327@postgresql.org> <832225.1739810351@sss.pgh.pa.us> <906545.1739821437@sss.pgh.pa.us> <911898.1739823180@sss.pgh.pa.us> <917262.1739825850@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1072645.1739835476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1249036.1739897685@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1761873.1739911114@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1773117.1739917446@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Sergey Belyashov message dated "Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:55:08 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1956235.1739948811.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 02:06:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1956236.1739948811@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Sergey Belyashov writes: > The 4th patch is not applicable for the current REL_17_STABLE branch. Yeah, I saw that, didn't work on fixing it yet. It looked like the diffs were mostly about the ExecOpen/CloseIndices calls in apply_handle_tuple_routing, which we already knew are completely bogus. So I'm hopeful that just removing whichever of them are in v17 will do the job --- but it'll require a full re-test to be sure :-( regards, tom lane