Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rej8a-00D5tf-Mv for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:07:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rej8Y-00HBmu-Mh for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:07:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rej8Y-00HBmm-Ep for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:07:50 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rej8V-001Gvz-KC for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:07:50 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 41QM7k8H1978376; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:07:46 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: matti.aarnio+postgresql@methics.fi cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18366: Not present at postgresql.org YUM repository In-reply-to: <18366-bfccaf6c4f5850a8@postgresql.org> References: <18366-bfccaf6c4f5850a8@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:21:37 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1978374.1708985266.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:07:46 -0500 Message-ID: <1978375.1708985266@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > Documentation says that PostgreSQL 16 is available for RHEL7, but the > repository does not have it. > Latest one is 15. Whatever documentation you are looking at is wrong: https://yum.postgresql.org/news/rhel7-postgresql-rpms-end-of-life/ So where did you see that claim? regards, tom lane