Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r2Yjy-00HPdv-Bi for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:20:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r2Yjw-00G8FY-Qk for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:20:40 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r2Yjw-00G8Ec-I6 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:20:40 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r2Yjp-006ESp-CQ for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:20:39 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3ADFKU9P1985243; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:20:31 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: sumanth.vankineni@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18193: CVE-2019-9193 In-reply-to: <18193-9d57393593895996@postgresql.org> References: <18193-9d57393593895996@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Mon, 13 Nov 2023 06:30:43 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1985241.1699888830.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:20:30 -0500 Message-ID: <1985242.1699888830@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > Just wanted to give an update, I'm not sure if it's mentioned anywhere o= n > the website. The PostgreSQl version 13.7 is also vuln to the > CVE-2019-9193. > The CVE states only In PostgreSQL 9.3 through 11.2. Please see https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/cve-2019-9193-not-a-security-vulnera= bility-1935/ That CVE is erroneous in full, and so the fact that it also misstates relevant versions is hardly surprising. regards, tom lane