Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1iz2d6-0001jB-12
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:08:56 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1iz2d4-0007U6-SY
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:08:54 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1iz2d4-0007TO-JL
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:08:54 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1iz2d2-0006OM-Ag
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:08:54 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 014I8kgY019960;
	Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:08:46 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
cc: depesz@depesz.com, Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>,
        pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #16171: Potential malformed JSON in explain output
In-reply-to: <5439.1580739342@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <16171-b72259ab75505fa2@postgresql.org>
 <495433FC-A268-4956-9B61-5FB135EE5B73@yesql.se>
 <157985813081.742.12901374861257824963.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org>
 <9342.1580585875@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <5217695A-8776-4F59-823A-B391DCA1F601@yesql.se>
 <1763.1580662112@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <2C0825D5-B231-431F-A505-E6B848B250FB@yesql.se>
 <5439.1580739342@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	message dated "Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:15:42 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <19958.1580839726.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:08:46 -0500
Message-ID: <19959.1580839726@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Precedence: bulk

I wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> I guess I'm leaning towards backpatching, but it's not entirely clear-cut.

> That's where I stand too.  I'll wait a day or so to see if anyone
> else comments; but if not, I'll back-patch.

Hearing no objections, done that way.

			regards, tom lane