Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WzX4L-0001er-5f for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:11:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WzX4K-0001Rt-MX for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:11:52 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WzX4K-0001Rk-11 for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:11:52 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WzX4G-0005fd-Kc for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:11:51 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WzX4D-0005Si-My; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:11:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:11:45 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Andres Freund , PostgreSQL Bugs Subject: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Message-ID: <20140624201145.GA17110@momjian.us> References: <20140619020633.GA20469@momjian.us> <20140619015205.GD3806@momjian.us> <20140619014034.GC3806@momjian.us> <20140619220425.GQ18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140619220425.GQ18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:04:25PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I wasn't happy with having that delete code added there when we do > > directory delete in the function above. I instead broke apart the > > delete and copy code and called the delete code where needed, in the > > attached patch. > > Makes sense, yeah. I didn't look closely enough to realize that the > function that does the copying also does the rmtree part. Hearing nothing, patch applied back through 9.3. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs