Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XBlkb-0000sH-2D for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:18:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XBlka-0007gn-II for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:18:04 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XBlkZ-0007gg-EP for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:18:03 +0000 Received: from mail.anarazel.de ([217.115.131.40]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XBlkV-0001Td-W1 for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:18:01 +0000 Received: from intern.anarazel.de (p5DDC6A23.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.220.106.35]) (Authenticated sender: andres@anarazel.de) by mail.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B22DD500001; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:17:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:17:57 +0200 From: Andres Freund To: Heikki Linnakangas Cc: Tom Lane , s.zuban@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #11032: Prepared transactions do not update pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() anymore Message-ID: <20140728141757.GN17793@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <20140724191127.32089.82261@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20429.1406238373@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20140724215743.GG16857@alap3.anarazel.de> <21266.1406241129@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20140724223459.GI16857@alap3.anarazel.de> <21620.1406242232@sss.pgh.pa.us> <53D62059.6060304@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53D62059.6060304@vmware.com> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org On 2014-07-28 13:05:13 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > We probably should set XLogRecord->xl_xid in COMMIT_/ABORT_PREPARED records > though. It seems weird not to, and it would simplify code that interprets > those records. But I don't think we should back-patch that. I doubt that'd be a net improvement - wouldn't that just make the life of anything tracking xid liveliness a bit more complicated? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs