Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztnct-0006Aw-Rg for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:16:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztnct-0006PT-1w for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:16:39 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztncr-0006Os-26 for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:16:37 +0000 Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com ([8.23.224.60]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztncj-00049P-Ex for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:16:35 +0000 X-No-IP: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [186.11.234.188]) (Authenticated sender: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5785740010E; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:16:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A88E035A0; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 23:16:18 -0300 (CLT) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 23:16:18 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Haribabu Kommi Cc: Michael Paquier , brown@fastmail.com, "pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password Message-ID: <20151104021618.GP6104@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20151102192626.GG6104@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org Haribabu Kommi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Haribabu Kommi > wrote: > And one more thing, the vacuumdb password behavior is present in back branches > also, is it worth back patching the vacuumdb fix to all supported > branches and apply > the jobs connection fix only to master and 9.5? Given the lack of complaints, I doubt it's worth the destabilization risk. Let's just patch 9.5 and be done with it. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs