Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxgR-0006Ds-Gi for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:46:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxgR-0003Pl-2y for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:46:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxgP-0003KO-TV; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:46:25 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxgM-0007Rq-Fo; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:46:25 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwxgI-0000oh-Mo; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:46:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:46:18 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: Andrew Dunstan , "David E. Wheeler" , Christophe Pettus , pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Message-ID: <20170926214618.GC7167@momjian.us> References: <27064.1506350579@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5f4f29bf-90b1-e49a-6cf9-069c59bc1067@2ndQuadrant.com> <40FDB1F3-932D-4912-B4C7-F1E26E331079@justatheory.com> <1090.1506365074@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9666.1506446327@sss.pgh.pa.us> <329.1506451066@sss.pgh.pa.us> <38835cdd-!c378-8d7a-013b-fd733c78c649@2ndQuadrant.com> <12792.1506456422@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20170926211419.GB7167@momjian.us> <16025.1506461535@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16025.1506461535@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:07:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Any other votes out there? > > > Well, I was concerned yesterday that we had a broken build farm so close > > to release. (I got consistent regression failures.) I think PG 11 would > > be better for this feature change, so I support reverting this. > > I'll take the blame for (most of) yesterday's failures in the v10 > branch, but they were unrelated to this patch --- they were because > of that SIGBUS patch I messed up. So that doesn't seem like a very > applicable argument. Still, it's true that this seems like the most > consequential patch that's gone into v10 post-RC1, certainly so if > you discount stuff that was back-patched further than v10. Oh, I couldn't untangle that the regression failures were unrelated to enums, so please ignore my opinion. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs