Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtOSB-0000So-3y for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 03:09:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtOS9-0005DX-On for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 03:09:45 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtOS9-000594-Bu for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 03:09:45 +0000 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtOS6-0004Cc-T1 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 03:09:44 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034A823401; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:09:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:09:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=5M0bxyY2SMmuIbf4j3rgCEsrqUO OZl6cpcBCI318WDk=; b=ZLfwecDXFAoU1uegBi/yyVZ9KvWw0bfxMMfD+2pfRqx fetXJk4z9oaE6oIYeI7qZql4NsUcmjThTzguPJt+MqMkibG5ZNNwm+wAzjs7miS0 zwrlfEZLISWWq7RTslTZIEtLHp2+JWUBsI94bg8pdUfPcOILvxHoTdPF4Zqh7/Yw 434LhM57FuV1+Ewi4IBWE6mA/gjXi0lPgVcoVqnwHvyf76f6KKmVnGC3IKNWG3E1 NRqhUH2i5VaT5r3NE8l+NSp1dufLMUdUbDy+VTdwX2XzoUU8qAnLbqiKIqdabDG0 MDdXfY8YbZSNWaTaKl9K9tAKIzy8N7MWO1BHtKn6twQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=5M0bxy Y2SMmuIbf4j3rgCEsrqUOOZl6cpcBCI318WDk=; b=l6StmjHCBJd9Yo+tMS1hhG Xck7AaUAPX6MrErNM1T4rKfrUqaMBhOb7QuMjS07EST7L+ccHqHqdhActgZEnXOK DD3em9TU9N682RuTn3JXA6V+ww7xXaK+qbj13XJNXKtLh4WESQkqbmuaydxeanhX sMLNSJF3Sd2yTQoPp1GfHLUH/kykqBEPF2uB/msYH2ehccxbIeN9xNZWjbPNTAEo /7/cP72zJn6pouPX8yCB2v/KDl7xiUVkjtzcjOgOKMIk0T8ceOYF6JV+bJxn8qVG l+Ap0sGV8MceTVb3TqkZVFT5udazfq4mdS86Mn0W3zCCtvVft6hUaqMV5Q2zJiDg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledruddttddgheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfghrlhcuvffnffculdejtd dmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgt hhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiieqne cukfhppeduudekrddvgedurddvgeelrddukedvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (mp76f1f9b6.ap.nuro.jp [118.241.249.182]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CC048E412F; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:09:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:09:27 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: David Rowley Cc: Tom Lane , Alvaro Herrera , Ash M , PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop function operation" on DB with functions having same name Message-ID: <20190212030927.GF1475@paquier.xyz> References: <201901071454.wxkoyoq4s5qp@alvherre.pgsql> <19400.1546994166@sss.pgh.pa.us> <13325.1549838359@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:36:17PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > Okay. Here's a modified patch with the enum. FWIW, it makes me a bit uneasy to change this function signature in back-branches if that's the intention as I suspect that it gets used in extensions.. For HEAD that's fine of course. -- Michael --jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlxiOOcACgkQnvQgOdby QH2RGg/9G2wJF+X8OvcUZT3RFbw96H8B4Uo91nf+48zPjol4iRQR3/8y2Y4BIR9g ERMD/LwWrmuervvnSY/oS73IL2UjsNR0208bmklCrwbBoq9L5dvFxyu1UK4CoIBe uRjYJ6blVNcZfciLTHUeHuxyY+Nvi9dFVhohNFBxHUrwEqHKFAjDrYti55BO1Hj9 gsNKeNE2RLTl65ATqY4SjqXZErsNVzTNUDJ0r76A3CPbWCk7g2VRx4af6kuSWxRd 6H/cCg4recT0yQDAeHAHJ/7a/ss25sewbO+h4ViwQHGakY+nuTGrr2zzH4LQrzlk xoG0u37SwrZ4zSTdCwh8SHRJWOyEeXLmgE2XFtCZ0E11cl/OSYO5Ox4AlkW3km0N 7nk6oWMSLLWMatlamMNyZ/FfdyfAN4DC5UjCOVvqAYAXYcBdVjk3qNNOf9t/Nsng QsM7jH5n2SFYOP2T9ToQMkcXbdK2marzAwGA/tQuqLkkaVXG28HW39CYivdoBG4z xY49xjibqoiWfd4oQHgSsnRmEar+JO+1rlx6yuDDJTrr9/BjUMBSjAsuaFFlX21y GAlF+5br9Q6uwo57NjHtLUmCkVXoyA2Duo4RBSEyNTkYbVeTU4p9IkQYAb6dcTyj /xEV/IxK/GB7qk50VliCWSGvVSh7UXpBKUKe12i+6LbovnxgkW0= =3H8N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV--