Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEmw4-0000T7-Uy for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 03:33:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEmw3-0005ZF-Hm for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 03:33:03 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEmw3-0005Y6-9S for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 03:33:03 +0000 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEmw0-0008KQ-PJ for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 03:33:02 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A0C3F3; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:32:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:32:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=+wr/LdwPTujnGRiQnoIRnkAcr6E W6nzwFeM9c83nW/8=; b=hpGcXOtBfB9J2uD/gEL3o/EB0MFXwSjajrSXrcYn7Qk chzD88aOvreRLFCyJgWXc3lLyRS+/Gn9fnzIfoRaI5v982VSRJRDqdTdH4ibf1y0 igzuyTIM79eFR5mFao2r9jKz/tvbJfJP3FwTr+EQbIT96VR1M7kdBdnmRXSjttPK DMAtBWMOC0B41KLo/995qfGO0MXX9I023pNgCFCgIPvcgprnTCt+ziqqghe5dTxo CTsSsIj+MVQQGfa+XvLuZ7uFVWNrUTnQsV4gjWeODCYIz8a5LFMR4DxqnAw4OMia o9tR3iG83ePxkb04CH9Wpp7xvISNK7wZmhUQeTpPdJw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+wr/Ld wPTujnGRiQnoIRnkAcr6EW6nzwFeM9c83nW/8=; b=un4M80efT/MyibLSs7essq qV/bEl2vM12xyINHPAlSXqF5CBvNARaHdMEXU0lY5CRa3j1cxuI5P/hdHAVbeA6V HzOoq2661MSPdGmCwFQVNOTrgsPRsSfNaGHCVe0ofbMxVjL13CT6jPoxBxJzMZKy B/4lPH+5rrJ3pWvXFwazw/1AxzaO77LHqFf4ilhJIgFI2EYdU9Gyh2cLht5KgGiX YFJOXs6moaYhNlDHuV4EnXOvyaGeCVkstFXa6CAu5F+UG5r0Pcs11X/VOsEDJPuP hYOh3rTdvU45CZ92DKUHt/GDwaw2pb32d327Ci3bBfy/OGa7o2n62yLr/9aglpDw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrvddtgdeilecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqh huihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecukfhppeduudekrddvgedurddvhedurdejleenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (mp76f1fb4f.ap.nuro.jp [118.241.251.79]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B7F60E4264; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:32:50 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Tom Lane Cc: Thomas Munro , Daniel Gustafsson , ANASTACIO Tiago , Peter Geoghegan , PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #15726: parallel queries failed ERROR: invalid name syntax CONTEXT: parallel worker Message-ID: <20190412033250.GE2144@paquier.xyz> References: <1831482307.24522245.1554199154256@mail.yahoo.com> <29888.1554218381@sss.pgh.pa.us> <11677.1554995054@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11677.1554995054@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The extra appearance of "parallel worker" seems a bit redundant, > though I don't know if we can get rid of it. >=20 > Could we at least be consistent about whether the context is > "parallel worker" or "parallel worker process"? Indeed. My vote would be to back-patch that stuff. -- Michael --GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlywBuIACgkQnvQgOdby QH08jRAAp+ilI4gcJ1Xl53/KD+qLb+5HYIQ4PlBG9JIKnLaRtDkvb4Q8UBv3SofD 8pNZKsE3jh9Ex1Ry5XQDOV71KyvdgbO1RYAqRqhR9Dpf8k8IlnDTL7vn3KAW4anH R4hWoOS6gPMv2iysULEbzD6GtrzuhqkN+ynlQrOEKqS/K9EvSgiR5cUjcCT4wZzY gzQIX7z+fwPFKhBRBkxgowuu+910figKw6eS1I1BiMww7Xhwb0d2UVdOru/g1myM yk2CG1qJql04ZLZXx4ckMU50ufjhSFTECeCDcnSkqF4BhaOAAX20OggBOe6GlD7b HRJg/F7CqSPQP/D4A+rvZtbVrRptA+81xSYCfxv//jO7Zw6e+s9Ej1MzNONrEl5d qKZgqEBCMY3WNf/WQyP02FYcZ3xNQ7YS3oYCXAUMDcIw1OgAG77o7r3QWXy3++qb STJrop4mm25OTwaNYqTUQ5iJcjCbm/ENbX8ycmx9z/sLX4vleTa+NG41x6iP5JI3 Njozw/Jzj4RBf/iDipJF7zQUlnsCvyZ/QIKAfA6u76FGJtOZKYnmO+Wg/9IVl8GZ Qa697pym1QjlRMP7XOrfglZQ/ZhwIrBUYQrPoEgxPrjJ3HnhD4cuk+o3H/wgbaQi Fk+VLqexJdksUckAopMwjiJgn1ZmRIbGe36e8l3JSZgT/sbUFuk= =f74n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER--