Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hWlAb-0000eI-Um for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 31 May 2019 17:18:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hWl9c-0007uL-NF for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 31 May 2019 17:17:20 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hWl9a-0007u0-Ms for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 31 May 2019 17:17:20 +0000 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hWl9X-0000zk-B9 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 31 May 2019 17:17:17 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB8411A4; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:17:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 31 May 2019 13:17:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=zIWucpWCcvczEVja5DLkr+lgMu1 vS+K7IHe3jgjPv0E=; b=R1YeasOkugJiZeSCdXAFDDeiLZKNbAMqoUP+dWy5Lql haoAsggV87wd+pHN1U0gtwpWGy39O5TtyHKwZn2NkfFkDbVOIuqY7W5DfnAJrmOg QYvgZsLTYHpp5Ry5VdO+bJy4rxe0dJ25bdrupQHcDUQFWTfwKNCteSGti8j0fsLW 8QpW+svDb20IIQoNXEY/3T3oDhRXmB1jZFHHR9JUMdO6O4SeAvyrmZ2DeAp9tEg7 1g8V284pbw5i5OrC6/7vyi9IEBMJwbNXfC5j1RlznoxB5kFuQ4YWGbRoKhdtgM3o zrc6nL0jHDDszMjE3vug8UpKMIr8EZXE/mbWZPtddYg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zIWucp WCcvczEVja5DLkr+lgMu1vS+K7IHe3jgjPv0E=; b=yIRCc+id/PO7G4ts3IWGGB B6OzEnkOJR7qUMgg7jFn222vVvuIhhp5g7dk3cFN7wYZ36bXauam8B2TxrkLRYiw 1o27hwxjjeWvahA+rD35DJFVZnNFrdTzCNnhMDWmt8o/jLB1ZDY4hWm+/P1BI90W aC60kHG+jdP8cO6fAJrLcKekbz1cWt44mSjbowzBC3GZ70WqjtBfxMeHWmqJ9o1B ZlrwxMd7ycEqh+yOMJUJI73XLdebnCAh5xnincWMRLCHB6KP64DxcoB8DEDMrPHU gHvs68xI0hUL7ER077h7QaQBlMJUlOP77PKfqyxP6RDwoGanIpvE0Fpoc2qsm/LA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudefuddguddugecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enfghrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredt tddunecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesph grqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecukfhppeefkedrieegrddujeejrdduvdeinecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiinecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (unknown [38.64.177.126]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4F52C80060; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:17:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 13:17:11 -0400 From: Michael Paquier To: Juan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Santamar=EDa?= Flecha Cc: serpashk@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15789: libpq compilation with OpenSSL 1.1.1b fails on Windows with Visual Studio 2017 Message-ID: <20190531142832.GQ2848@paquier.xyz> References: <15789-8fc75dea3c5a17c8@postgresql.org> <20190528105802.GC2682@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Vo2ArcSjcOqS/fzO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --Vo2ArcSjcOqS/fzO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Juan Jos=E9 Santamar=EDa Flecha w= rote: > Sure, done as [1]. The attached patch is still for 11, will it be back > patched? I don't see a reason why we should not back-patch something like what you propose where build with OpenSSL 1.1.0 is supported (aka down to 9.5) if that proves to be reliable enough. -- Michael --Vo2ArcSjcOqS/fzO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlzxYZYACgkQnvQgOdby QH2A+A//bIRahkHBp0j3+Rvfn0m9XkmaHTJukSVoGNyJF0K9hsGZS0gT2EcPDHYa zfO83cSc4BQPlsAfSKc0IgfTNJUy15m0Uv4bLkBewfsTLVxcTacs0j//xJp3zf7v Cs6JVJ7yheKBkCm/8DhGusHG5cdR1ziamLJrSGhDnFSMk7mR9MMaf0JuwwY/f6s8 UryusNiDHA9AOEXRuBrau61HVh0kmJsMpgBpBLwWXq4rmYvgroL9CyDLRclmjt0C tzo/64NZW92AKeFlleKCwP2rJ5Werp7+2HVBNJjf6FHG9b19+lAKiA6TEHsFaEOS 9oBY1boCiChdl5J00/Jb5UavLsrcIbxCW+miU4+Eg7QVpLs0bnxC78Q+sPQMEUhP EX7KB3QnN1/u5T3R3Dn4SuosUTixnDI+vwXs+VplS4tP28sJW/D0wYY+TNdu2SNn ortLmI6Rn3koTSxY1DRkAo7O31k/nzBpRLBDm2DNn8tGfQJJNhd8K6FLKruTWSRt eZJ+0twQsF0lPDVIDmqF7qR3Dq+OoW5KL80d2cBmJjQmd5d6rw4kVThzC07GOCZv XjQwgZKkhnn8AfeUAIGG3IyHfF27sDs8yBmyFMwp1usyIrz4s0RMbt6MejIW0QxB f/Mfs3XpGx6Hn77ljTtfCLwia9zc/UPJs/tF6WCfNRk71pkMeTw= =rOD+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Vo2ArcSjcOqS/fzO--