Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXwkI-0003BA-7W for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 23:52:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXwkF-0005xW-LT for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 23:52:03 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXwkD-0005xP-V3 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 23:52:03 +0000 Received: from [66.111.4.29] (helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXwkB-0007lP-Bo for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 23:52:00 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B2B21F48; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 19:51:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 19:51:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=x6nWsSKyQcGZXuthQTeeqmFXyFA JvDRkwtLT4RqZxuM=; b=mHI3PG7SZ5WQ6ZEjWraFOLTy9UzItCqGUNpOc/qQigH GZZZmZg8MTaW6iwynC9EJrlHGK5xV9OOr1YOM2YXJg6fdK4KgbR5ZVdQZhuw+d95 Obp3epgsdXLzWHlcO0oKUAtzAiyKaap8wFrBvdaiB0JAW4h/DJ6Yw5L2+8XM8Np3 aDVqVkpVa56NgLlJazsf+oKbyKyVqYXy163934cHg27mLDgE5uKYtSgFzfv1v8Od wkKCUfhKt53FzPrmGYsVgdGYONciuVeyzPeOTXae0ZEQY3TydC+77A8aphMD4pSg zeSFg1/rbAnSIsH0OKR1DGmbEZrvh9e4RMPNW0gb+Ow== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=x6nWsS KyQcGZXuthQTeeqmFXyFAJvDRkwtLT4RqZxuM=; b=mXuGm4dy9TPV/6XD3Orcye 6VxsSILEU7RdCrOSKAJyX8qQBkAPwHcScqDXjK4/Qhb036uJRFngxeV9dMOWytP9 vqaPVoKl84FZCPLAoVkFZjJI/5AhwKsQTa0sVGfE0wMvZMWjD9mjLzCO5kOH7ab5 IlabIflksZ6UfdMP5eE5k9pooMaP3xd2kduVNsh1n/BJcpJCwUjEfPPJ6u7skjLt YvcRaNCzyTQizzRdMStfvNDBJJJQ1YjEKjHqOJrSePb26xA9KBxqso6Ijz4HWeGI dOPVDITYZ/V6ROaP0LXHqC9XmCCfb0V2kJlIYmNBIeLEv02FnrjK0HJSx2HlxiCA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudefkedgvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucfkphepuddukedrvdeguddrvdegledrudeivdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (mp76f1f9a2.ap.nuro.jp [118.241.249.162]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DE70C380086; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 19:51:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:51:32 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Sandeep Thakkar Cc: Juan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Santamar=EDa?= Flecha , serpashk@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15789: libpq compilation with OpenSSL 1.1.1b fails on Windows with Visual Studio 2017 Message-ID: <20190603235132.GA1529@paquier.xyz> References: <15789-8fc75dea3c5a17c8@postgresql.org> <20190528105802.GC2682@paquier.xyz> <20190531142832.GQ2848@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 66.111.4.29 (deferred) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:30:49PM +0530, Sandeep Thakkar wrote: > OpenSSL 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 both are going out of Support in 2019 and PG 9.4 is > supported till Feb2020. > Ideally, 1.1.1x support should be backpatched until 9.4 There is no point to patch a stable branch if it has no support for the OpenSSL version we target. Now, bb132cdd has added support for OpenSSL 1.1.0 in 9.4, so there is actually no reason to not patch 9.4 as well and you are right. Missed that in my initial lookup of the commit logs as this was applied 7 months after the 9.5~ portions. -- Michael --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlz1soQACgkQnvQgOdby QH2k0w/9F0PNfzQny31DbpUTvhdaDroZm7Y67Jj8fo3Th1Ku5mXL94+tRShxuXPR UAufcaE1TqMu/ypEjlYCdOgRcknuPAqJJokFPUFCI6e/jEsvwQ1OHxxK1zrCqANB WdYxIWgEg4rf/lxBELt7qM1ERydzOv3e+jZ2ZeOdRLebRXFLU/SBCrc7ZrRFRwa8 7wm2mrMQ/+N7yAhSrmWJmDoG+TL+B1KkGaC17U0f/3VfMrSd3mU0/s7/DfzbrEab x5DpNMyLPn2pFVKO0yHXwuWggmU0vj0VCCk2Q3R6UsPnvM8XBUjtT0eCPrcXKbiE ZUjsgHfG3W9N46jgMS3Zlg/isaMs4oqIKWGcFVHLIo3djGRLI7S7Vw0/HT5IPeTa 9n3/8Zkg0Tg9gZbYa1G9TDp0mZ/eKphIsfyjylazbta1r76lrzgLbg3G+fDKzI2g DIqD3Yy9UpX3pTUKy2c8u4Jy6di1rNVS1PBYZQMzD7sjeXGubmlFbUmc3FI8FH6J kKf8Cuq8JWj+Dth5yFLsu1SJkt58gJkpJnmWDlOFMQ6PtJ4S+4t48g6RVsgZzut4 gaMsNYOl48UR0SwUv4Pjy7yijPsTk07vR9qly1KpsY+sd7coqYRCRIKpOVRn+X4J NAlWjdFSIotTF3FbCcPWDpLOIIp3myTxyaE14mKTMhLFvtPBUvE= =Nryo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--