Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjkTM-0008CE-LF for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 13:11:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjkTL-0002Vf-CQ for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 13:11:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjkTL-0002VY-4g for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 13:11:23 +0000 Received: from feynman.df7cb.de ([195.49.152.168]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hjkTI-0008Mj-Uh for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 13:11:22 +0000 Received: from msg.df7cb.de (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:1472:d0e0:76e5:bff:fef3:7e00]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by feynman.df7cb.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45gsY35wKyz3F02; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 15:11:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 15:11:18 +0200 From: Christoph Berg To: Peter Geoghegan Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #15896: =?iso-8859-1?Q?pg=5Fupgrad?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?e_from_10-or-earlier=3A_TRAP=3A_FailedAssertion=28=BB!=28m?= =?iso-8859-1?B?ZXRhZC0+YnRtX3ZlcnNpb24gPj0gMymr?= Message-ID: <20190706131118.GA9497@msg.df7cb.de> References: <15896-5b25e260fdb0b081@postgresql.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Re: Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-06 > > When pg_upgrading from 10-or-earlier to 12beta2 or 13devel, an assertion is > > raised. (Spotted by Debian's postgresql-common upgrade tests. Previously > > missed because we were only testing version+1 upgrades.) > > Obviously you were right to adopt pg_upgrade tests that cross more > than one version at a time. Thanks! Indeed, and running 9.6->10->11 tests (that were present before as well, but never run) revealed another bug in pg_upgradecluster itself... Testsuites are just awesome. Christoph