Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hszAj-0004L3-8q for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:42:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hszAi-0004ra-2L for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:42:20 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hszAh-0004rB-NT for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:42:19 +0000 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hszAf-0007lo-Ek for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:42:18 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A683121E1C; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:42:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:42:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=JSm62MShjbuwY89uczyucZU+uDS rT2NjAWLQPz37OFY=; b=UanQdDH7n9VVqmEJB0UBCRbwZmcR7H+s8GCOxO3g37H oLle0MCh1gArxKpp3aEvSLW8PPQhxw+QHeHFnZAxZ99+biPaYNFGGlX0VzQncp7d MkBo3t4yZdgbJ7OydALw3CNk4rIClqm8NIPDhHhJ6ISY2lOgG9WO+3zXGqwJJWFN 40ZyQGcqTWWa3BcrMNjpCfU0O35KxeYRrKLALTuZcdFL+aBw0Uq7zaCYoiFGafs9 IK0Ym9NHjry1qFXttAD5ABDXmO6V1KcCKoYxRP1iMrKZbZo0XD7YUWebOqj4ED8c LqPgwQefnLpNqimpciViU5IUntZqPJCZclOUfy3bkFg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=JSm62M ShjbuwY89uczyucZU+uDSrT2NjAWLQPz37OFY=; b=mHN19rclsqGrsXuRfHrz+u j4MMX8A7JYbHB4wdEDkfdQoF/r9FUFktaAR1hhd6r35pmEJ4KYw4m1TZGvI3aXSn cuzAaNVLeKRSl4okhve7z2ufWhtW497hFzRqqI7BaBf63E3W78raGzTGjKqhJLaB flSOhOAwEXfBOvlhfkJ+DeKHI35YN3ztxWT2bHG+LjT9Kgbvf+8XaOdJ5bM9bJxj Is9L6EErX1dvIsvzHdXdTtdsbFX5vJHdbFtMJpGMcENzURRDTgppKLlndQFwAWg7 JB9upCjWZsZxe7orgfkCQPh3rmkTEKcqjLjeHiKzpdaNyu39fdWzfm42YMr5byWg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrleeigdefiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqh huihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecukfhppeduudekrddvgedurddvgeekrddvtddvnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiinecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (mp76f1f8ca.ap.nuro.jp [118.241.248.202]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B82E0380075; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:42:11 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Daniel Gustafsson Cc: rafaelthca@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15932: Module passwordcheck doesn't reference previous hooks Message-ID: <20190801004211.GD29334@paquier.xyz> References: <15932-78f48f9ef166778c@postgresql.org> <20190730022420.GC1742@paquier.xyz> <20190731071503.GA29334@paquier.xyz> <97C01A5D-D814-413E-A8C8-146B17FBB63B@yesql.se> <20190731073401.GB29334@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:54:17AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Hmm, ok, IMO my comment applies to those as well, but it may very well be me > just reading it wrong. Either way, +1 for pushing your patch. I am not saying that this cannot be improved either, still I am not sure how it could be reworded. And if we do that, it should be applied to all places where we use it. I have fixed the issue and back-patched down to 9.4. Perhaps that was not worth caring about, but the versions for the back-branches were not really an issue. Thanks for the report, Rafael. And thanks for the review, Daniel. -- Michael --3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl1CNWMACgkQnvQgOdby QH0QYA/8D6E/p3W8BgkfsXF5IyeRa0TfL20DVYWf+WOABHZIj2Na7ztbqaj87Yqp MznxtU3j8+cOD/F85TPKWOOalsmlE0BMLZTTIgqmIzMbTgezh7uPjRR6L7abKvdp 5C7KRuxaOFYh+T8Gh+FkV9KLLesmUr3c30DjzYQoiTshB5+5Nvhvlx3SDgOOMuuP Cw+FNU9zHdCg57iY6QUcbVeZIezaVFsrz7lNpX8Vcqi2TI9JawCrx2h+dvPThTbh B5onsHYW1m6154xQLG18v2J2PIhfpDrymQwdlLSXXxYCTSYNhI2/FfNcpC8zW1RL MAbmb3JLM7stNyDi53kQSVLCeOjaMEclkYc22g/i18aD27VW5MsTElig1PN98CcB nXDedNlEtrX42QwIddS5RN21VL6C4N7Hm7hXgfhhvUONgEcbp66SyO9VrDVX3YoV 5LzK/6juTny8dG5mMsEAmU1XJoJZDxX1JPn4bxQWJXM52e+RHYFijk+JLT7v6XHr 376/g/bHmjIoxn72YUA2cC4kz4GQCZhu08qruaXcssILKMjAxH0OMGMXWwgqJPl7 q1m9BENrH3HVat+D7KqVipHWtDMeQvFeF1Gh8FAGea4HtN2BHNXHOdrGentcHNks HUachq9kYo4NC6B7PsRntasJuEDBFRoIUcK9hSu2+IXmpqoqE4g= =KxhG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ--