Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIaJm-0000R8-A4 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:25:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIaJl-00059c-0b for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:25:29 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIaJk-00059L-40 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:25:28 +0000 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIaJc-0001VA-L8 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:25:27 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E367CD; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:25:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:25:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anarazel.de; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=8Ozptp7L3DVaVaH3oXm7SnzsbOn W08FhgX6Mkt75wdE=; b=Ppkn/CvaBirxGwDfApZoUZ/uVMSy+acOz3uAjKa5s1R xUoJhxP8V5Lr/gUhELJSrgcttCVl7dNSzIiW1ag3KRv7MaIUXdNar4MzHFJyRnCU CwVGTdZJ4FFbgW5ZqwCrxyx4wG07vxyvt+NNI1mfj0idJQuOmG+zlL/bXTTRQdyI BIVOwekNodNuy1kjyON3P/mlqEm2ZjZFya1ohnZdO8WZR0b1mrYxb93cuUDvp8C5 tr/waUzewKyx3+OVbFJg+I9pS3zRr4ibUgVmHDhW2Ug7kMNjIH5xHUJoSbiXBbz0 AF7mYTy00FwxOenk+rQ4TB+cRG7VnbwOpdY0yxt9TpA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=8Ozptp 7L3DVaVaH3oXm7SnzsbOnW08FhgX6Mkt75wdE=; b=GtM7ng978n2KJQWfoi5rji 4fh0Yuxq7a09ICWFqNMaXg1Bw8Ro5KbTN8NFuPiV12O/zbsQKfMpqx81emHpmVAN pzng88uISgJG3+sRon5oHlan1n67rwE/U4rJtnGGOKKtxbwln3iKxhqoQBgKxmwa vVVnbiGZ3GBlC9kmDMNQM+UGqphU8SwWVDnhfOL5fK3qoKXFTtA7Mp1ai7PAcCEd nIqoS3jpgRQT+xL9Cquq61SsLNV1EsLp/p55ysuNwwmvt+FWjMAW8cSyKG63L5J3 lNjovJJe0MZpUpPq7FGQs9XS/JVq6P3WFPXeI9ERvwmgvHgLPNWsCUh2ACs15CJw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrieefgdeludcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheptehnughrvghs ucfhrhgvuhhnugcuoegrnhgurhgvshesrghnrghrrgiivghlrdguvgeqnecukfhppeeije drudeitddrvddukedrvdefjeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghnughrvghs segrnhgrrhgriigvlhdruggvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from intern.anarazel.de (c-67-160-218-237.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.160.218.237]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DF0BE80062; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:25:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:25:15 -0700 From: Andres Freund To: Michael Paquier Cc: buschmann@nidsa.net, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Michael Paquier Subject: Re: BUG #16039: PANIC when activating replication slots in Postgres 12.0 64bit under Windows Message-ID: <20191010152515.q5uo3pg6ai7ppvd2@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <16039-196fc97cc05e141c@postgresql.org> <20191004200605.yqcmn75otebwcvyj@alap3.anarazel.de> <20191006045548.GA14532@paquier.xyz> <20191008003240.GA1613@paquier.xyz> <20191008160953.odwxuxiy5agci4fj@alap3.anarazel.de> <20191009044207.GA21379@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191009044207.GA21379@paquier.xyz> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Hi, On 2019-10-09 13:42:07 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Yuck :(. Luckily that's a pretty narrow case to hit. We really need > > windows coverage for this stuff. And also just general buildfarm > > coverage, it's not like we're immune from bugs on unixoid OSs etiher. > > test_decoding hits that easily for me, and we test that on Windows for > some time now as there is a buildfarm module. That's a bit depressing. Well, that's because it intentionally tries to hit that case ;) But yea, it's not good. I think we really ought to remove the -F from pg_regress.c, and leave that up to the caller. Right now it's just about impossible to configure without patching the source, unless I miss something. > >> Andres, others, any thoughts about this issue? Are there any > >> objections if I just fix it? > > > > Not here. > > Done this one. Thanks. Greetings, Andres Freund