Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIinF-0002LG-Gd for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:28:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIinE-0002BB-5o for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:28:28 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIinC-0002An-DB for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:28:27 +0000 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIin8-0006K5-PH for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:28:26 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74DD22178; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:28:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:28:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=NWaCSwt02lAmC0zcffNYAZ7yojd 8dEt6HXDStQo21HU=; b=RMJVdOaWN3PvYwS+Wb8uc4sUbOwZkP+AHRQT/jv136D +SbE1xNPIHsp0XYNyKh0Ob1GvpFbk9MDnJQtLKLRIjOwg5UhEEJTZHBmhPCNJqxJ 7igM93jAXunFmLB4YLfWRD+AMHn353gpXsx8+lWdiB/z1ipMmpgcGLgwNjQBaOz6 9PjxOepn8oVjgQRf90UJ3B0YJ3Rbe0rw2PqO5/k8idWGWaJQkpujxCim5/v8/+ta h0sSRFjhMVOu39+lDwWFo16vDYcAExQ/veTEjtF34u+EufiD64hXGXlbDEefo51g uT/Eo/TvPyLlFimoy/tFOsRfN+2fs9HGFPq7QQgifoA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=NWaCSw t02lAmC0zcffNYAZ7yojd8dEt6HXDStQo21HU=; b=aqYvOd+wCfxAbcKD3mBB2N uaf7vfwx4wKEdg121NPIlQk3LFB1tuehgC6p5rRgpiO+XFc0VABl7gNtLXiiLq6n dQG3aV6nQT53fr9ZFTH3tOl2HXEPc7VLLH1hCGev6NyQYxq+3Vem4utP3yqeU64f mbaoYGVCBZT/fu2ip5vnHJM3/QdE//ZluIJGubqSkWoNgpVASytXMn0b/WC22pgJ hReSBixbdHu1vJyRAVFyiwmwbjm6Djyix9Abrlv8qyFC2J7wRML0810iVa8r2zkQ /GD1jGCj/yeS8v8VaFFpY3wJHF/0PRsZUJ77JUKV5YWOvPrtnWTW72B9BOfU3u0Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrieeggdefgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdefhedmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqh huihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehpohhsthhgrhgvshhqlhdrohhrghenucfk phepudduuddruddtvddrudektddrudekheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmh hitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 491A58005A; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:28:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:28:14 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Andres Freund Cc: buschmann@nidsa.net, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Michael Paquier Subject: Re: BUG #16039: PANIC when activating replication slots in Postgres 12.0 64bit under Windows Message-ID: <20191011002814.GA2373@paquier.xyz> References: <16039-196fc97cc05e141c@postgresql.org> <20191004200605.yqcmn75otebwcvyj@alap3.anarazel.de> <20191006045548.GA14532@paquier.xyz> <20191008003240.GA1613@paquier.xyz> <20191008160953.odwxuxiy5agci4fj@alap3.anarazel.de> <20191009044207.GA21379@paquier.xyz> <20191010152515.q5uo3pg6ai7ppvd2@alap3.anarazel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191010152515.q5uo3pg6ai7ppvd2@alap3.anarazel.de> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 08:25:15AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > I think we really ought to remove the -F from pg_regress.c, and leave > that up to the caller. Right now it's just about impossible to > configure without patching the source, unless I miss something. Well, I have just posted something about that: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20191009062640.GB21379@paquier.xyz Perhaps there are better ideas for that particular problem, let's see. -- Michael --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl2fzJ4ACgkQnvQgOdby QH3yZQ/6Av1ZWGtyC4tSO76OfwXOaPGY6c2rqKeBjMKx0KJ/O99Lc8/kgFiS8OKc pGXKSVgv1fE3ItLRASJa2HLUN0btEPY+7MO+rB0dbl4hJneX3NPRT+U71Y1f6Q6L B/hRL6FMPUGgb2qZ+aPpForcfSLp0bKp1ltI7d5uVRsBzo+enviDfXfBivdkRX90 L5oXFbXFFXHB8KvZ7H2lxan1BBMNhombO/EEsytGI2p87fzuIvdW2gvBTUzjho0a ABNSueGCGN0EYjmLNMlZmcMhnRVvvg/tMOlgxBJqBwSSunaQ3V0Zef65Py/hc0bH J0NG6WIW3OB5i3hWKv5E4Eyx8HLDcCd1OqSMA8grMjO7VbL+gdQuqrFLYT542GQ1 FOro0/wVwsTOdtQOl9N09G2h6AiSOsLrtp4FggJrYBHXaGujhBuSJ7uvq5eELM6c T1vyb/3/xLV/KFnBySUNraUBGlMItdTZMCcB58gyWm/4+pIrbfVsvuNuvkUNWjmx nplLW1Kq6mPPMKoqcde5f0fHqy4V3xSCOPacA91PsRCfoUTnigO6Ee/B0MZQmomC Zg/484Ei4odtxtpWk8MDDudEA0O2W0CNe57DX2jPNniqAdFtVTE7e4mx7yXX6fvU TfsOZIc40NpqP9/i0lNR1DlbnZ1o3g6+5VHUeGsiWc+g04EVPzM= =Mu8/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--