Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7IcB-0004UC-H3 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:50:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j7IcA-0007NI-4k for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:50:06 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Ic8-0007LR-3h for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:50:05 +0000 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Ic4-0003j6-Il for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:50:03 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC8F220DD; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:49:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:49:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=fweMnm1FJ6aQ2g6ut+fBBIDh5d0 0zk2mJADkWszY+98=; b=MT/ZLJjkhgIAfGXgaX3seU+cXlogYqLnE6gSGWc581l znj3ablxoQObZNx1Mr+OzH9RmwZrKgqiuR6PR2AIOdchOHBRXnyCfW/TBJBN0Vuu aFvrTQnY2YrkfIH4UKnQbPNeAxcRZgZYHV9FOZOJ0v+1b7aLeiveP3suewqlrKrF lhSh2WjVVRCbzagN381VZ7GGYmPbnfS8JOV1I0+1L+/G4YNeUDW4PLw8tEIc586/ WsZzny5TqefJGd2NIEU4HY9gh4jrNfZG66w4RqkmrZiZp/LELx4A3x1JKJrbkA11 tXZOWt+JySPCOrAQy9gD4XAI2ux0BF9tmsDoASmvKXQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=fweMnm 1FJ6aQ2g6ut+fBBIDh5d00zk2mJADkWszY+98=; b=2JBKsoXMWQ94Q0F5oOql2C l6IpwJxJdr9YGs+PIsrNlt7nLgPNxo3NyLVWrWU/m96KZ48Uq0lCWv8wZoxK8Z1V nmiFztths1uz00BeVlV+CUNHzEN/395+9XLcXx/24jjJHxFPVOYh/gjXbw6dxFM5 GN3ZKxO301V0qqbiTyBBYNz+OLwnoxFilgzJu/AYd/yQl0RfvCZl8/y+XciaFV/a vDYdqsTcHQsuWCBQk9e5t5bGyGNXYN+LAG2Q+9GWigZRB53wcl3CO0Yt1EK6KLp5 uNGDJkPoXj0G13v6I6Hb2d+mg+pCInK2EJglA3tC+h2LlgLFk3eW2MK/fauMj9Lw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrleeigdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqh huihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecukfhppeduuddurddutddvrddukedtrddukeehnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesph grqhhuihgvrhdrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0957930610DB; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:49:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:49:52 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Amit Langote Cc: exclusion@gmail.com, PostgreSQL mailing lists , Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: BUG #16276: Server crash on an invalid attempt to attach a partition to an index Message-ID: <20200227124952.GC403330@paquier.xyz> References: <16276-5cd1dcc8fb8be7b5@postgresql.org> <20200226080624.GH17153@paquier.xyz> <20200227023120.GC1969@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 05:14:28PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > Simply dropping the culprit assertion might be enough for > back-branches, but it seems misleading to silently ignore the bound > IMO. Yeah, I have been considering this option, still I am hesitating about what to do on HEAD. My own take would be to fix this issue on all branches by removing the assertion, but I think that we should wait first a couple of days to see if Alvaro can comment on this issue. -- Michael --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl5XuvAACgkQnvQgOdby QH2ypQ/+P8YDF1jLj6S3JJPF1xHO2NnUYKKuHYiZxLZ2CDqvj0rdvxmclPgHTZNl cKItONielB+MCQyeagh6HRPIPhJfovjbweiz2JdvgtR2nqHD/h1bha7XsnfpkH+O LJ6YE05oJFVcN7wZRv5T2kWZs2OM0DJY6p9IBgI8DAHnOSRg09ZXpXLAAj0kjLAi HzeccBdUJKjzX64aYJq1zhsjATvbuueg7so0nAL+yiTZEbu4qtcwyEMe7FfSBeZF fQBLNWCywAX95WxM3KyN/44sSv+dmvcK7PvNAmpxYdmNMI7IfH/WW37/H30beG+r 1seqD+3tUFxLX2FXWv9omkFRfhuZG9vLH6/X0kf6tl6DwLLR6wOy3rBgI/W+d736 Q3k/efXaCXptwIh8i4ON+OcKDiGKibpzAnk2MwpVWA0c5djTcDYMlokKrtvtNhGI 8xR5863SEIL4wSSHyKIOxJL90y6CLJDMsIFM4W+LyastMaqiLCscfCBb/xNHWrOI 8Iqd7Gj2y6iIq09ingp12LLLZEtTiuvx9CpfEzrfDzBmeaKcxIlriXXiwqMBL3xB RcjC9HRzMao+Kf95AeXd7X5DbWbjxzTSHmom7tnS1zXi1SLLaQNuaQio4QOYZnoI F+/JKiqOHEjnJ7/dpfeqPv8IL08UXQuGYe9V+tsPY4SwuudhYg4= =Tgsk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr--