Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jh9Zm-0006VA-QS for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:27:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jh9Zj-0004PF-Vh for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:27:47 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jh9Zj-0004P3-P9 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:27:47 +0000 Received: from feynman.df7cb.de ([195.49.152.168]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jh9Zh-0000ca-Hq for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:27:47 +0000 Received: from msg.df7cb.de (unknown [IPv6:2003:5b:203b:100:7627:eaff:fe52:8e03]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by feynman.df7cb.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49df3h2Hfxz3DwZ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:27:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:27:43 +0200 From: Christoph Berg To: Tom Lane Cc: PostgreSQL Bugs Subject: Re: time values past 24:00:00 (or rather 23:59:60) Message-ID: <20200605102743.GC2621506@msg.df7cb.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL Bugs References: <20200520125807.GB296739@msg.df7cb.de> <6194.1590040381@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1313969.1591304074@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1313969.1591304074@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Re: Tom Lane > I pushed this fix, but only as far back as v10. To apply it in the > 9.x branches, we'd need to make the code support float timestamps, > and I didn't think it was worth the trouble. Aye. Thanks! Christoph